ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Logistics and SCM practices may be defined as a set
of activities undertaken to promote effective and efficient management of supply
chains. These include supplier partnership, physical movement of goods, meeting
customer demands and information sharing throughout the supply chain. Some of
the key logistics and SCM practices that impact performance are related to
estimation of customer needs, efficient and effective delivery, integration and
collaboration throughout the supply chain, sharing of information and vision
using ICT as well as informal methods and use of specialists for performing
specific jobs across the supply chain. All of these practices impact logistics
and supply chain performance.
The de-regulation of the
Indian economy in the 1990s has attracted global players and has unleashed a
new competitive spirit. However, a distinctive characteristic of the Indian
economic environment is the inadequacy of basic inputs normally required to
support organized economic activity. The UPS Asia Business Monitor Survey, 2004
(Available at: http://www.etintelligence.com/ ) finds
that besides the lack of government support, poor logistics infrastructure and
poor supply chain efficiency are the major obstacles to competitiveness in India . The
Indian infrastructure comprising roads, railways, airports, seaports, ICT and
energy production is poorer as compared to many other countries. However,
things are changing for the better at a fast pace. The Growth Competitiveness
Index survey conducted by the Geneva-based World Economic Forum (WEF) for 2005-06
puts India
at 50th position among 117 countries in its Global Competitiveness
Report, five places up from previous years ranking of 55. (Available at: http:// /www.weforum.org/)
A few years ago, logistics
and SCM were seen as necessary evils in India ; today they are seen as a
matter of survival and competitive advantage. As companies look at logistics
and SCM strategically, they turn to specialized service providers to cut out
non-core activities from within. A rising focus on outsourcing is leading to a
surge in business performance for logistics service providers. One offshoot of
the demand for logistics services is that many companies are changing their
names to include ‘logistics’ somewhere as well, much like the dot-com boom
times in the early 1990s.
Worldwide, best-in-class
companies have invested in enabling infrastructure and technology to realize
their supply chain vision into a reality. These include integrated supply chain
cost models for decisive inventory management, technology for handling supply
chain throughput and information systems capable of fostering visibility across
organizational boundaries. Dell Computers and Wal-Mart were able to achieve
leadership positions because of their efficient and effective supply chain
management practices. Both of these have invested enormously in ICT to help
them have continued focus on customer needs and supply chain efficiencies. Many
instances of novel and innovative supply chain practices such as cross-docking,
Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR), extensive use of
bar-codes and now RFID, and direct-to-home delivery have been introduced by
these firms. Wal-Mart had its own satellite communication system as early as
1983. Wal-Mart’s PoS data is shared with its suppliers to reduce the dependence
on forecasts.
Similarly, there are
multi-billion companies which have shifted focus from courier and cargo to
logistics and supply chain; from being freight forwarders to integrated
shippers; and from customs clearances to consultants. Indian SCM service
providers are also evolving rapidly. The shift in service providers from just
movers of material to logistics to supply chain services has quickened in the
past few years. Truckers are moving up into integrated haulers; large Indian
companies with multi-million spends on logistics are hiving off entire
divisions into service providers who handle not just the parent’s logistics but
also of others; others are forming joint ventures to leverage skills. IT
companies now provide not just the hardware and software, but consultancy for
solutions, examples being Satyam, Wipro, Infosys and TCS. Big
players like DHL have invested US $ 250 million in India and more
is on the way. It has already acquired Blue Dart, the top firm in air
logistics business. Container Corporation of India (Concor), at US$ 380 millions,
the largest listed firm in logistics in India is diversifying. Others, like
Gati, XPS and Safexpress, are expanding to UAE, Sri Lanka , Singapore and Bangladesh as
well as into new areas like modern warehousing.
In
our on-site observations, we cover a wide spectrum of firms covering varied
businesses so as to get a reasonable insight into logistics and SCM practices.
Care has been taken to ensure that these firms and their supply chains provide
diversity in terms of ownership and industry sectors such as global travel,
financial and network services, retail, milk and milk products, health
services, sales and distribution of electronic consumer products, power
generation, electrical appliances and switchgears, hospitality, international
logistics service, domestic transport service, automobiles and auto-ancillary,
Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) and computers. The same is shown in the Table
I.
Table I:
Nature of Business and Number of Firms Covered in Present Study
Nature of Business
|
Number of Firms
|
Automobiles
|
5
|
Food and Apparel
Retail Chains
|
4
|
FMCG
|
3
|
Auto-ancillary
|
2
|
Electrical
Appliances and Switchgear
|
2
|
Computers
|
1
|
Domestic
Transport Service Provider
|
1
|
Global travel,
financial and network services provider
|
1
|
Hotel
|
1
|
International
Logistics Service Provider
|
1
|
Milk and Milk
Products
|
1
|
Power Generation
|
1
|
Sales and
Distribution of Electronic Consumer Products
|
1
|
Tannery
|
1
|
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature portrays logistics and SCM practices from a variety of
different perspectives with a common goal of ultimately improving performance
and competitiveness. Based on literature, we find that the important supply
chain practices concerns are mainly related to:
1. Supply Chain Collaboration and Partnership with various stakeholders
such as the product developers, suppliers, channel partners and end-users.
2. Supply Chain Structure including facilities network design taking
into account related transportation and logistics.
3. Forecasting and Demand Management to cope with supply chain
complexity in a cost-effective and delivery-efficient way.
4. Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to
facilitate the above.
While there is plenty of
published literature that explains or espouses SCM, there is a dearth of
empirical studies examining logistics and SCM practices. Galt and Dale (1991)
study ten organizations in the UK
and find that they are working to reduce their supplier base and to improve
their communications with the suppliers. Fernie (1995) carries out an
international comparison of SCM in the grocery retailing industry. He finds
significant differences in inventory held in the supply chain by the US and European
grocery retailers, which could be explained by difference in degrees of their
SCM adoption. Tan and Wisner (2000) compare SCM in the US and Europe . Tan (2002) relates SCM practices and concerns to
firm’s performance based on data from US companies. He lists nine important
supply chain concerns such as lack of sophisticated ICT infra-structure,
insufficient integration due to lack of trust and collaboration among the
supply chain stakeholders and thereby lack of supply chain effectiveness and
efficiencies. Basnet et al. (2003) report the current status of SCM in New Zealand ,
while Sahay et al. (2003) discuss supply chain strategies and structures in India . These
surveys rank the perceived importance of some SCM activities, types of
hindrances and management tools on the success of SCM using representative
samples mostly from manufacturing. Quayle (2003) surveys supply chain
management practice in UK
industrial SMEs (Small Manufacturing Enterprises) while Kemppainen and
Vepsalainen (2003) probe current SCM practices in Finnish industrial supply
chains through interviews of managers in six supply chains. They analyze the
change of SCM both in terms of operational practices and organizational
capabilities. Chin et al. (2004) conduct a survey that examines the success
factors in developing and implementing supply chain management strategies for Hong Kong manufacturers. Moberg et al. (2002) state that
there is little literature on information exchange. Feldmann and Muller (2003)
examine the problem of how to establish an incentive scheme to furnish reliable
and truthful information in supply chains.
There is little literature on logistics and SCM practices
in India .
Available literature focuses either on the best practices (Joshi and Chopra,
2004) or on re-engineering of internal operations of the firms (Deshmukh and
Mohanty, 2004, Kankal and Pund, 2004). In context of ICT, Saxena and Sahay
(2000) compare the manufacturing intent to be an agile manufacturer and their
Information Technology (IT) infrastructure in terms of scope of use, extent of
use and integration of IT-based systems. The more recent studies are mainly
based on questionnaire surveys and secondary data sources (Sahay and Mohan,
2003, www.etintelligence.com,
Sahay et al., 2006). Vrat (2004) discusses some issues and challenges as well as the potential of SCM in India . All these
studies find Indian firms generally lagging behind their counterparts in the
developed countries.
LOGISTICS
AND SCM PRACTICES FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
Industry and academic estimates
put logistics and SCM spend in India
at approximately 13% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Global estimates for
this vary and are around 13% of GDP in China and about 9% of GDP in the US . The
transportation cost in India
accounts for nearly 40% of the cost of production, with more than half the
goods being moved by road. Trucking accounts for nearly 70% of transportation
and accounts for 60% of all logistics cost. 67% of truck ownership is in the
hands of small unorganized players. Road is followed by rail and finally
coastal shipping. Rail has been steadily losing ground due to myopic government
strategies and inherent inefficiencies. The freight movement of Indian railways
has risen to 411354 net tonne-kilometers (Available at: http://www.indianrail.gov.in/) and the
total road length is 3315231 kilometers (Available at: http://www.nhai.org). Though enormous maritime
routes are available combination of poor government policies and lack of
initiative from the private sector, water which is probably the cheapest mode
of transport is barely used. Air as a mode is limited to a small percentage of
courier shipments. Various SCM spend indicators such as in-bound transportation
costs, inventory related costs and distribution expenses as percentage of net
sales vary from industry to industry. However, as per Centre for Monitoring
Indian Economy (CMIE), they are coming down over a period of years. The
aggregate of the same for nine major manufacturing industries for four years
are shown in Table II. These industries spent nearly 17-18% of their net sales
on various logistics activities, including distribution, warehousing, and
inventory. Global averages are around 9-12%. So, there is ample scope to reduce
spends on logistics. This in turn allows companies to protect operating margins
during downturns and make above-normal profits during upturns.
Table II:
SCM Spend in 9 Major Indian Manufacturing Industries
SCM Spend Indicator
|
2001-02
|
2002-03
|
2003-04
|
2004-05
|
In-bound Transportation Costs as percentage of Net Sales
|
1.5%
|
1.4%
|
1.3%
|
1.4%
|
Inventory-related Costs as percentage of Net Sales
|
13.3%
|
13.9%
|
13.1%
|
13.1%
|
Distribution Expenses as percentage of Net Sales
|
3.0%
|
2.8%
|
2.8%
|
2.7%
|
Total SCM Spend as percentage of Net Sales
|
17.8%
|
18.1%
|
17.2%
|
17.2%
|
Source: CMIE
|
The focus on costs
and ICT-enabled services is leading to electronic procurement that cuts time
and costs (including transaction costs) and brings in transparency and speed.
The ERP industry in India
is worth US$ 300 million and is growing at over 15% a year. 52% of the
respondents in ETIG (Economic Times Intelligence Group) SCM 2004 survey
(Available at: http://www.etintelligence.com/)
have implemented ERP and three-fourths of these find ERP to be extremely
effective in business. 44% of the companies surveyed had already implemented
data warehousing and mining applications, and another 26% had plans to do so.
Almost every firm found this practice to yield good results in revealing
consumer trends, patterns and potential segments.
For supply chain tracking, the most preferred method is the truck
driver reporting his location. Another method gaining popularity is the use of
SMS (Short Messaging Service). Time lags here can be pre-determined. Depending
on the number of times the SMS signal is polled and sent by to the base
station, the location of the vehicle can be accurately determined. With Global
Positioning Systems (GPS), this is no longer the issue. However, the use of GPS
for supply chain management in India
is relatively low. Service providers like Transport Corporation of India (TCI)
have poured in US$ 0.34 million for GPS in their trucks. Firms like Bajaj,
Maruti Udyog Limited, TVS Motors and Bharat Shell are already using TCI’s
GPS systems.
LOGISTICS AND SCM PRACTICES OBSERVED ON-SITE IN 25 FIRMS
In our on-site observations,
we find that the primary focus is on quality, cost and service. Recently, responsiveness
(delivery speed, volume flexibility and innovation) is also catching up
management attention. Correspondingly, the major concerns in all these firms
and their supply chains are related to costs, clarity of demand, reliability of
partners, shortening delivery cycle, production and logistics flexibility and
innovation in supply chain practices. Sharing of benefits within the supply
chains has not yet gained much attention. Firms show relatively high awareness
of modern supply chain planning and control tools, including software and
mathematical models. However, the utilization of such tools is still at a
relatively low level. Relationships are messy and partnerships are short of
true strategic alliances. Still, some benefits are being derived. Firms,
especially in the automotive, retail, manufacturing and FMCG sectors, are
increasingly opting to outsource their logistic requirements to specialized
service providers. The positive business atmosphere and a burgeoning consumer
market are making the shipper community push the logistic service providers
hard for efficient supply chain value propositions. Many firms in our study
have gone for spend management outsourcing instead of procurement management.
In firms with manufacturing as the core process,
primary focus is still on in-house manufacturing though trend towards contract
manufacturing is on the upswing. Quality assurance has become an order
qualifier rather than being an order winner. The emergence of Service Level
Agreements (SLAs) with internal customers can be seen in most of the firms.
Presently, they are still informal in nature and not strictly binding. Firms
have few manufacturing facilities with 20-24 warehouses and many dealers. This
number of warehouses is a direct consequence of the tax-holidays and the erstwhile
excise and custom duty structure in India . High collaboration and
partnerships with vendors is strongly evident in this sector.
There is big focus on vendor development. Firms focus
on developing vendors in geographical proximity. Another discernible trend is
the gradual shifting of responsibilities and risks to vendors. In automobiles
sector, there is collaboration and partnerships downstream with the dealers as
well. Transportation and logistics being non-core activities are generally
outsourced. As regards implementation and utilization of ICT, 6 out of 8 firms
use standard ERP software, while one uses in-house developed legacy software.
The firms appreciate the importance of inventory and order tracking for which
they use Wide Area Network (WAN), Extranet and Internet. They seem to be
catching up fast with their counterparts in the developed world. However,
forecasting is still based on targets from dealers/ sales force. This is an
area where they are much behind.
The focus of most of the service firms is on express
deliveries and logistics solutions. They focus on efficient and effective
service and better customer reach. Most of the firms have established highly
responsive call centers with stringent performance metrics. High collaboration
and partnerships with partners can be seen. The firms are generally going for
global procurement and long-term strategic deals. They have multiple channels
downstream so as to achieve door-step reach to the ever-increasing customer
base in India .
Transportation and logistics is generally through their own fleet. In some
cases, it is outsourced. Routing and scheduling software are increasingly being
used for these activities. 5 out of 6 firms use standard ERP software. There is
high focus on tracking of customer orders and and technologies like bar codes
and GPS are being employed. Production process is mainly “pull” system.
In FMCG and perishables sector, the primary focus is
on product availability (refilling the shelves). The companies have few
manufacturing facilities with complex distribution channels. Packaging is
generally outsourced. Mostly, the goods are packaged near the markets. There is
a very high collaboration with suppliers and firms are going for global
procurement. E-procurement is on the rise. At the same time, firms are
negotiating long-term strategic deals. There are multiple channels downstream
so as to meet the objective of next-door reach. Transportation and logistics
services are generally outsourced to third parties. Transportation is mainly by
road and the lead-time of these supply chains is still as high as 9-12 weeks.
This is quite understandable, given the size of India and the state of its
infra-structural facilities. Here too, most of the firms use ERP and
forecasting is based on data from dealers/ sales force.
In retail chains, primary focus is on expansion and
reaching the consumer. The sector is witnessing tremendous growth with
increasing acceptability by the growing Indian middle class. Two of the retail
chains in our study are low cost mass market players, while the third one is
mainly into branded apparel. Their facilities are expanding to meet the
increasing demands. These firms have their own warehouses and retail outlets.
The layouts of these facilities are still evolving. Most of them are smaller
replica of retail chains in the developed countries or famous shopping cities
like Singapore
and Dubai . The
firms have high collaboration and partnerships with their suppliers who are generally
located in close proximity. Transportation and Logistics is outsourced. The implementation
and utilization of ICT though limited, is growing rapidly. One firm uses ERP
and another uses in-house developed Resource Enterprise Management (REM). These
firms have not only gone for bar coding of items, but are pilot testing RFID and
other smart card technologies as well. Forecasting is based on historical data
which is tinkered by management intervention.
We find
that most of the firms are not getting or using real-time demand data from
customers. Reasons cited for the same range from long, complex supply chains,
lack of data and ICT integration to lack of funds to go in for automation.
However, they are making greater investments in ICT, field force automation and
cheaper software. A majority of the Indian subsidiaries and joint venture firms
use real-time data sharing and find it extremely effective. In contrast, none
of the family-owned firms uses it.
Based on our observations
and secondary data, the major challenges to logistics and SCM practices in India
are related to integrating the supply chain, interfacing supply chain
department within a firm with other functions, evolution of logistics solution
providers, sharing real-time demand data across partners to ensure demand
visibility in the supply chain, resistance to change within and outside the
firms, aligning supply chain partners to common objectives, openness of
partners to technology adoption and standardizing technology across them. Over
time, some of these capabilities will become an entry requirement for those
wishing to compete. However, first movers are likely to continue to benefit
from their pioneering efforts, and continue pushing forward seeking further
differentiation.
DISCUSSIONS
To succeed today and to pave
the way for a better future, firms in India need to create strong
linkages with their logistics and supply chain partners. More and more of them
today are realizing the importance of developing and implementing a
comprehensive logistics and supply chain strategy – and then linking this
strategy to the overall business goals. Adopting these initiatives first and
foremost requires taking a long-term view and having an extensive focus on all
the channels in the total transformation process to create a productive and
reliable supply chain. Technology, which was earlier taken to be a driver for
doing business in a particular fashion, has become a “necessary enabler” for
aligning business to consumer demand. It can change the way we capture and
analyze information, differentiate products and services, configure and sell
existing products, crash order cycle times, introduce new products and so on.
ICT can thus achieve breakthroughs in the area of supply chain design,
configuration and planning, which otherwise can never be thought about. There’s
a concerted move to use ICT for data collection and forecasting.
Efforts to extend a common
information system platform between partners will assist in the transferring of
information. Ideally one system should span all functions throughout a supply
chain. Firms in India
are preparing themselves to harness power of ICT to improve supply chains. The
size of the firm now matters less as the cost of these technologies has been
reducing continuously so that even smaller firm can afford them. The goal should
be to implement a system that can make a decision more quickly and with better
accuracy. Many firms have gone for ERP. Ready access to transactional data does
not automatically lead to improved decision making. These transactional data
must be analyzed through effective models to support fact based
decision-making. Analytical information technologies should be helpful in
achieving this purpose through the descriptive and normative models for
effective decision-making within and outside the firm. Since forecasting
involves sharing competition-sensitive data beforehand, this practice hasn’t
taken off. If one probes deeper, it appears that forecasting of customers
themselves is uncertain, fluid and based on incomplete understanding of trends
and patterns, which, in turn, passes on the complexity to the vendors.
Companies in electronics, auto, auto ancillaries and IT sectors are using the
collaborative forecast practice widely. It may be observed that the customer
base in these industries is not as diverse or massive as in FMCG, which have a
few million of shops and dealers to ask data from. This may be one of the
reasons why consumer-oriented industries do not use collaborative forecasting
to a greater degree. All the major FMCG companies have programs in place to
link their distributors to the firm via Internet or Intranet based systems. For
example, HLL uses RSNet, Marico MINet and Dabur has
its Daburnet. As a result, forecasting accuracies are increasing. SCM
partners are emerging in banking, IT, telecom and insurance as well.
With India
becoming the factory of the world, establishment of hubs and spokes with quick
international connections will only increase. Blue Dart and DHL
have already set up seven hubs. The proliferation of global majors in major
industry verticals has heralded the arrival of international supply chain
service providers into the country. At the same time many of the Indian
business majors have shown inclination to manage the group logistics in a
unified manner to realize the benefits of consolidation efficiencies. These
logistics arm are set up to service the captive requirements of the parent
company and subsequently exploit the market demand. Few of them have ventured
into setting up their own logistics companies. Realizing the potential in the
outsourced logistics market and the threat arising out of the entry of global
logistics firms, the Indian logistics service providers are expanding their
basket of services, looking beyond storing and transportation of products and
raw materials and focusing on related services such as customs clearing and
forwarding, labeling and packaging, fleet management, light assembly, kitting,
repairs & reverse logistics, inventory management etc. Transporters are
upgrading themselves to logistics solution providers. Dynamic engagement is
developing between stock and fulfillment in warehousing services. The
complexion and nature of warehousing will change, but the requirement for break
bulk and re-packaging will still remain. The value of activity will be also
higher, thereby offering service providers’ a means to shore up margins.
The SCM managers need to
know the form and purpose of mathematical models and software before they apply
them. Lack of this understanding may result in inferior use of models and analysis,
and implementation of sub-optimal supply chain plans. They must also learn to
appreciate the differences between transactional and analytical information
technologies if superior supply chain management is to be achieved. The
development of web-based/internet applications is another tool to process
information pertaining to supply chain such as processing procurement
activities both operationally and strategically. Use of e-mail/faxes, worldwide
web (www), EDI, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), internet auctions, etc., are
the few examples that web-based/internet technologies can offer to perform SCM
activities more efficiently. Operationally firms can cut the procurement
process time and improve the auditing process. Increasing use of internet/ intranets
is resulting in more fluid and frequent exchange of information between firms.
Successful logistics and supply
chain management depends heavily on the state of the infrastructure scenario in
the country. Undoubtedly, the state of infrastructure in India has been hampering
the industrial and economic performance for long. Infrastructure is the most
quoted factor hindering supply chain competitiveness. This needs urgent remedy:
most other bottlenecks of regulations and capital are falling away and it's only
roads, ports and airports that hold Indian logistics back. Higher fuel cost in India lead to
high inland movement cost. Poor conditions and low load-bearing capacity of
roads lead to more wear and tear of vehicles, and slower movement. Imposition
of load restrictions, permits for inter-state movement, lengthy and cumbersome
documentation, large number of public holidays make lead-times larger with
higher variability. Transportation costs too go up. It requires a concerted
effort by the industry and government to dismantle bottlenecks in the
completion of infrastructure-related projects and creation of demand-aligned
capacities in sectors of logistics and information technology. The government is planning to
set up 13 inland ports at a cost of US$ 190 millions. The project is to be
implemented through the public-private partnership model. To improve the
productivity of wagons, railways are going to reduce terminal detention below
the national average of 16 hours. At present, 25% rakes take more than 24 hours
and 50% rakes take more than 16 hours in loading and unloading. Similarly,
plans have been laid down to reduce the wagon turnaround time from 5.0 to 4.5 days through effective
implementation of new terminal incentive cum-engine on load scheme. By increasing
the manufacturing capacity of wagons, it is likely to load 2.2m tonne of
freight on a daily basis and achieve the target of 800m tonne of freight during
the year. In March 2006, the railway ministry
has announced the start up of double stacked container trains running on
‘freight corridors’. This is a welcome step forward for Indian logistics. At
least half-a dozen private companies have applied for various categories of
licenses for rail containers.
CONCLUSIONS
We examine the state of logistics
and supply chain management practices in India covering a wide spectrum of
firms with at least one field visit and substantiate on-site observations and
informal discussions and interviews with data and information from secondary
sources. Thus, we assess the current level of logistics and supply chain
practices as suggested by Sahay et al. (2006). Our findings indicate that logistics
and SCM practices are influenced by contextual factors such as the type of
industry, firm size, its position in the supply chain, supply chain length and
the type of supply chain. They are also influenced by regulatory and economic
environment, available infrastructure and competition with other supply chains.
We identify the logistics and SCM practices of these firms and discern various
emerging trends as well as areas of concern. We also suggest opportunities for
improvements. Indian firms need to act fast to capitalize on these
opportunities to be competitive with the world market. The findings from this
study provide the type of information on logistics and supply chain management
practices in India
that may help the Indian industry to benchmark these practices vis-Ã -vis corresponding
practices in other countries.
The management and structures of supply chains in India have
transformed since the early 1990s when they were perceived as linear chains of
companies and managements focused on improving the efficiency of material
flows. Indian firms are quite aware of the best logistics and SCM practices,
but many of them are yet to practice them actively. They are generally adopting
these practices piecemeal and supply chain integration is yet to take place in
most of the chains. Increasing customer requirements and improved ICT have
affected SCM efforts. Today the extended
multi-tier structure of supply chains as well as the need for better
forecasting, collaborative planning, effective logistics and information
sharing is better understood. In future, ongoing outsourcing and specialization
are expected to result in demand-supply networks, with shared technology and
systems, extended decision rights and non-territorial services. The awareness
of planning and control techniques and communication means is high and work on
increasing and improving supply chain integration and collaboration is likely
to be intensified in the near future.
Based
on our exploratory study, some emerging trends can be discerned. There is a
growing focus on customer and end-consumer in terms of higher product
availability, customer reach, and responsiveness. Concepts like Customer
Relationship Management (CRM) are being tried. Most of the firms have a good
facilities network design under given constraints. A very conspicuous trend is towards
higher degree of collaboration and partnerships both upstream and downstream
the supply chain. The degree is different in different firms. However, the
economy of scale/ scope for supply chain entities to experience win-win
situations is still awaited. Transportation and logistics are getting due
attention and as a result some good third party and fourth party logistics
service providers have emerged. The long-stressed importance of focusing on
core competences is taking shape due to increased outsourcing of non-core
operations. There is a growing trend towards implementation of ICT. However,
most firms have a long way to go to take full advantage of the promises of
supply chain integration.
Logistics and supply chain
practices in India
show that visibility is still limited. The companies have a realistic view on
the advantages and risks of information sharing and so information is shared
only selectively. Our study reveals that most Indian firms have aligned their logistics
and supply chain objectives with their business objectives. However, due to
some aberrations and diseconomies of scale/ scope most of them are not able to
reap full potential benefits. Action is required by the Indian government to
improve the infrastructure for better functioning of various supply chains. Firms and their supply
chains need to closely integrate themselves into a network, carefully manage
the complexity that ensues, align their business strategy with logistics and supply
chain operations, and leverage information and communication technology with
process improvement and pioneer operational innovation for superior
performance. They also need to rigorously measure and monitor critical
operational performance metrics such as customer service, responsiveness,
supply chain costs, asset utilization, product quality and operational
flexibility in order to achieve overall business success. Our
findings are in agreement with Kemppainen and Vepsalainen (2003) that the
distinction between partners and standard suppliers or customers guides
collaboration.
Our study reveals a few
areas of concern. One of the major areas of concern with most of the firms is
related to redesigning their facilities network after Value Added Tax (VAT)
implementation in most of the states in 2005-06. VAT is a multistage tax,
levied on value added at different stages of production and distribution of a
commodity or the supply of a service. The earlier structure of state taxes and laws meant
setting up multiple warehouses in a state cost-effective. After VAT, there
could be just few warehouses serving a host of smaller, transit warehouses in
over 4-5 surrounding states, boosting the creation of hubs and spokes, the most
efficient model of logistics. This will require not only
strategic redesign but also involve other considerations related to relocation
of facilities and reallocation of capacities. With emergence of web-based tools, on-line transaction security
has become an important area of concern. Packaging is another area of concern for most of these firms and
their supply chains.
The level of collaboration
and partnerships upstream the supply chain still requires significant efforts.
Concepts like Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), revenue sharing and long-term
contracts are exceptions rather than norms. Same applies to level of
collaboration and partnerships downstream where trust and genuine information
sharing are conspicuous by their absence. There are numerous infra-structural
bottlenecks for transportation and logistics and various stakeholders need to
address it on an urgent basis. ICT implementation is costly and many times has
not been utilized to its full potential. Given advances in other logistics and supply
chain practices, it was really disheartening to note that for most firms,
forecasting is still not based on PoS data. This is a prime area for
collaborative efforts. Another point to note is that India is still a sellers’ market
despite growing competition and this has introduced inertia in some supply
chains. Growing incomes and consumer awareness will probably force such supply
chains to shed this inertia. The low level of application of some of ICT and
insufficient skills should be the main concerns for government, academic and
professional institutions, as well as for senior and middle management.
Establishing trustworthy relationships among whole supply chain partners is the
most important factor to share accurate information and to establish effective
and efficient logistics and SCM practices. If managed well, reduction of system
wide costs can be achieved, let alone increased customer service level and
satisfaction.
There are many avenues for
improvements for logistics and supply chain management practices in India . We are
in total agreement with Tan (2002) that a massive commitment by important
stakeholders is required for evolving truly efficient and effective supply
chains. There is ample scope for facilities network redesign. Infra-structural
bottlenecks need to be overcome. The golden quadrilateral project and
initiatives by railways and ports administration in the last few months are
good indicators that the concerned authorities are waking up. The golden
quadrilateral road project will address some of the connectivity issues, but
the larger problem is not so much a six-lane road as good roads. Ventures like
BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) and tolled roads all exist - but the essence is
that law enforcement about technical standards must be made stringent. ICT
implementation and utilization is low and needs to be spruced up. Forecasting
based on PoS data is likely to come into use once there is more collaboration
and trust, economies of scale and scope for supply chain entities and
enabling-ICT are in place. Benchmarking
and learning good practices should be encouraged by government, industry
associations and other stakeholders. Government should move from a regulator’s
role to a facilitator’s role. A high degree of operational efficiency and cost
efficiency will provide the much needed competitive edge to various supply
chains in India .
LIMITATIONS OF OUR
WORK
We present only a snap-shot
view of the logistics and SCM practices in India . The firms for on-site
observations were selected as a convenience sample and so may not be truly cross-sectional.
Ours is only an exploratory study where data regarding logistics infrastructure
was gathered from secondary sources and on-site observation data too was substantiated
from secondary sources. Further, as the concept of logistics and SCM is complex
and involves a network of companies in the effort of producing and delivering a
final product, its entire domain can not be covered in just one study.
FUTURE RESEARCH
DIRECTIONS
This research opens the way
for in-depth studies of some of the areas of concern identified for logistics
and supply chain management practices. Research may be carried out using
specific cases to study these practices at firm level in detail. It should
cover multiple functional areas (logistics, marketing, IT, operations, etc.) of
a single firm in much more systematic manner. Later on, the same may be
extended to supply chains. It may be worthwhile to investigate how these
practices differ across firm size. Business-to-business transactions in India have just
started. Some detailed study may be carried out in this area. Further, the idea
of establishing a ‘third party’ Supply Chain Manager Firm to reliably and
truthfully share information as suggested by Feldmann and Muller (2003) may be
explored. Finally, research should also focus on establishing actual
performance improvements in logistics and supply chain management leading to
cost-savings and customer satisfaction.
REFERENCES
Basnet, C., Corner, J., Wisner, J. and Tan, K-C.
(2003). Benchmarking supply chain management practice in New Zealand .
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8, 57-64.
Chin,
K-S, Rao Tumalla, V.M., Leung, J.P.F. and Tang, X. (2004). A study on supply
chain management practices: The Hong Kong manufacturing perspective.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34,
505-524.
Deshmukh
S.G. and Mohanty, R.P. (2004). Re-engineering of supply chain: Lessons from
Select Case Studies. In Sahay, B.S.
(Ed.), Supply Chain Management for Global Competitiveness, 2nd Edition,
Macmillan, New Delhi ,
509-526.
Feldmann.,
M. and Muller, S. (2003). An incentive scheme for true information providing in
Supply Chains. Omega, 31, 63-73.
Fernie, J., (1995). International Comparisons of
Supply Chain Management in Grocery Retailing. Service Industries Journal, 15,
134-147.
Galt, J.D.A., and Dale, B G., (1991). Supplier
Development: A British Case Study. International Journal of Purchasing &
Materials Management, 27, 16-22.
http://www.etintelligence.com/
http://www.weforum.org/
Joshi,
V. and Chopra, S.K. (2004). Best Practices in Supply Chain Management at Modi
Xerox. In Sahay, B.S. (Ed.), Supply Chain Management for Global
Competitiveness, 2nd Edition, Macmillan, New
Delhi , 549-562.
Kankal,
R.A. and Pund, B.S. (2004). Reengineering of supply chain: The case of Crompton
Greaves. In Sahay, B.S. (Ed.), Supply Chain Management for Global
Competitiveness, 2nd Edition, Macmillan, New
Delhi , 527-537.
Kemppainen,
K. and Vepsalainen, A.P.J. (2003). Trends in industrial supply chains and
networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics
Management, 33, 701-719.
Moberg, C.R., Cutler, B.D., Gross, A. and Speh, T.W.
(2002). Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32,
755-770.
Quayle,
M. (2003). A study of supply chain management practice in UK industrial
SMEs. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8, 79-86.
Sahay,
B.S. and Mohan, R. (2003). Supply chain management practices in Indian industry.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33,
582-606.
Sahay,
B.S., Gupta, J.N.D. and Mohan, R. (2006). Managing supply chains for
competitiveness: the Indian scenario. Supply Chain Management: An International
Journal, 11, 15-24.
Saxena
K.B.C. and Sahay, B.S. (2000). Managing IT for world-class manufacturing: the
Indian scenario. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 29-57.
Tan,
K.C. (2002). Supply Chain Management: Practices, Concerns, and Performance
Issues. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35, 51-62.
Tan,
K.C. and Wisner, J. (2000). Supply Chain Management Practices in the United States
and Europe . Research Paper Series of the APICS
Educational and Research Foundation and The Supply-Chain Council, Stock No.
07029, pp. 43.
Vrat,
P. (2004). Supply chain management in India : Issues and challenges. In
Sahay, B.S. (Ed.), Supply Chain Management for Global Competitiveness, 2nd
Edition, Macmillan, New Delhi ,
13-26.
MBA guide
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please give your comments in order to make the site better.